| Profile
Services
Clients
Books
For Free
> Audits
Home
JRC Training Solutions
Info@JRCtrainingsolutions.com 310.398.1341 |
|
Sales training … every sales
representative at every organization needs it. Many organizations invest
significant expenditures of time and resources to try to give their sales
force a top-notch sales training experience. But is that what’s
really happening? How do you know if sales training provides the knowledge
and skills necessary to enable sales representatives and sales managers to
achieve key business and sales goals?
One way to ensure that sales
training is really first-rate … that it’s
worth the expense and provides sufficient tangible results … is to build
it on a solid practical foundation. That’s
what sales force training audits provide. The right kind of audit,
undertaken for appropriate reasons and with realistic expectations on the
part of all concerned, can be a powerful dynamic tool for improving sales
force productivity.
Types
of Sales Force Training Audits
There are three
main types of sales force training audits.
Needs
confirmation audit. The purpose of this type of audit is to
confirm (or refute!) what is believed to be already known about sales
training requirements, based on a specific situation.
Suppose that ABC Automotive is going to introduce a new car or truck into
its existing model lineup. A clear-cut set of marketing objectives for the
vehicle has been identified. In this situation, a sales force needs
confirmation training audit would examine questions like:
- Who needs training? For example,
sales consultants only or other members of the retail sales team at the
dealership too?
-
What are
the key training requirements for those who should receive sales
training? For example, what should be the overall strategy and
approach to sales training? What training delivery formats/media
should be used?
-
What other
issues are involved? For example, what’s the timeframe to move
forward with sales training, based on when the new vehicle will be
launched?
Needs
analysis audit. The second type of sales force training audit
involves a more general situation in which the overall goal is to link
sales training programs and events to key organization/sales goals. This
audit may also be used to better understand the way a business sells its
products/services, how its customers buy, and what they really want.
Suppose that XYZ Marketing is a fairly new but rapidly growing concern.
The organization currently serve about a dozen clients, who range in size
from small to very large. XYZ’s sales force varies widely in both
on-the-job experience and industry knowledge. Competition is also keenly
intense in the marketplace in which XYZ operates. In this situation, a
sales force needs analysis training audit would examine such questions as:
- What
is the composition and nature of our sales force? For example, what do
they know? What are they good at and where do they need improvement?
-
What kind
of structured sales training program will take sales representatives
from apprenticeship to top performers?
-
What will
be the likely end result of building/implementing a new sales training
solution? What’s the long-term negative impact of continuing with
the status quo?
-
What other
factors besides training impact sales performance? Morale? Compensation? Product
quality vs the competition?
Course/curriculum
effectiveness audit. This sales force training audit performs a
very different function from those discussed above. The other audits are
used primarily to identify sales training needs and specify a plan of
action to address those needs. The course/curriculum effectiveness audit,
on the other hand, evaluates the success/value of existing sales training
programs, courses, or related events. During this audit, specific
enhancements and changes are recommended or entirely new sales training
products are proposed.
A sales force training audit of this type would examine questions like:
- What are the main
strengths/weakness of the course(s) or curriculum under consideration?
-
Are
the proper learning/performance objectives being addressed?
-
Is
there a good match between objectives and content? Between objectives
and learning activities?
-
Do
the implementation/delivery methods used support the needs of the
sales force?
Process
Although each sales force training audit is unique, the process can be
divided into four phases:
- Preparation. Typically this
begins with a definition of project goals. Then the audit methodology
is defined and agreed upon.
-
Data
collection. For example, one-to-one or group interviews with sales
representatives, including average performers, top performers, and new
hires; review of existing sales training materials; attend sales
meetings and training classes; and interview sales managers.
-
Data
analysis.
-
Presentation.
The findings are presented and reviewed in an informal ‘‘yellow
pad’’ meeting among the core members of the audit team. Feedback
from the yellow pad review is incorporated into a written report.
Results and recommendations are then presented to executive
management.
What Will It Cost? How Long Will It
Take?
The consultant’s answer … it
depends. Some sales force training audits can be highly detailed and
complex, taking up to several months to complete. Other, more informal,
audits can be accomplished in just a few weeks. It all depends on the
project goals and scope. Such factors as the size, diversity, and
experience of the sales force; what’s prompting the audit; how data will
be collected; the length and
intricacy of the sales cycle; and the competitive landscape all need
to be considered.
Work With An Expert
Working with outside experts can
help you accomplish sales force training audits more efficiently as well
as more effectively. Use experts at multiple levels of involvement to
supplement your own internal resources. For example:
- If you have experienced resources
on staff who are available to work on an audit … use outside experts
on an occasional/as-needed basis to provide an objective perspective,
QA at key project milestones, and guidance/feedback on especially
thorny matters.
-
If you
have less experienced resources on staff or if staff members have
limited availability due to other work commitments … use outside
experts on a supplemental basis to perform such tasks as generating
key work outputs, like methodology workplans or data collection
instruments.
-
If you
have inexperienced resources on staff or if more experienced staff
members have no availability due to other commitments … use outside
experts to conduct the entire audit, from soup to nuts.
All options can be highly successful, depending on the individual
circumstances and the requirements of the specific situation.
For a broader/deeper perspective on
these and related topics, check out:
|
|
|